tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80521172024-02-27T21:02:18.047-08:00JSINGOODA political blogJsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.comBlogger81125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-76743588403972910762009-08-27T15:35:00.000-07:002009-08-27T15:36:42.340-07:00Despite multiple "tax hike" referendums failing at the voting booth, the leftist tyrants that lord over the state of California are fully prepared to completely ignore all common sense and the will of the electorate, and <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-taxes27-2009aug27,0,1796963.story">screw its citizens</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><b>Even higher taxes coming for Californians</b><br /><br />Lower brackets and reduced deductions mean yet higher payments to Sacramento for 2009.<br /><br />By Shane Goldmacher<br /><br />August 27, 2009<br /><br />Reporting from Sacramento - While Californians are still feeling the sting of income and sales tax hikes signed into law earlier this year, now comes news that state tax authorities plan to take a little more from their pockets.<br /><br />For only the second time in 30 years, the tax board is lowering the point where each tax bracket begins, bumping many people into a higher category. At the same time, officials are cutting back some deductions. Everyone will pay more, even people whose bracket or income doesn't change.<br /></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><br />Highest taxes in the nation already, and these morons still feel it isn't enough already. Jesus.<br /><br /><i>But wait, you racists, you haven't funded this diamond rings for crackwhores program fully. The $200K a year bureaucrats in charge of this necessary government safety net are specialer than you or your children or your mortgage, so we'd like to rape your personal income budget just a wee bit more.<br /><br /></i>And these are the sort of politicians and administrators that Obamacare supporters think could effectively and responsibly run a national socialized health care system?<br /><br />Riiiiiiiight.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-79403334021302569162009-08-26T13:29:00.001-07:002009-08-26T13:29:29.946-07:00Ted's dead, baby. Ted's dead.<p>Ted Kennedy <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obit_ted_kennedy;_ylt=Arp144.HA7BUC7uko0q24yqs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTMxaXNhaDFkBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwODI2L3VzX29iaXRfdGVkX2tlbm5lZHkEY3BvcwMxBHBvcwMzBHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3J5BHNsawNmdWxsbmJzcHN0b3I-">bites the big one</a>:</p><blockquote><blockquote><p>HYANNIS PORT, Mass. – <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1251315157_0" style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;">Edward M. Kennedy</span> of Massachusetts, last surviving brother in an American political dynasty and one of the most influential senators in history, died at his home on Cape Cod after a yearlong struggle with brain cancer. He was 77.</p></blockquote></blockquote><p>Oddly, I think I hated this moron more for his tyrannical, anti-liberty politics than the for fact that he murdered Mary Jo Kopechne, but, in my defense, that crash was ancient history to someone my age. It still certainly colors my emotions towards him as a public figure. I can't sympathize with or get behind the outpouring of grief for this dirtbag, any more than I could for Michael Jackson or other celebrities that get away with major crimes. I might be a little more gracious of someone of his cloth without an incident like this coloring my views. But who knows. I was so disgusted by the mean-spirited comments from leftists that I read about Robert Novak after his passing, I feel absolutely no obligation to be the least bit diplomatic when it comes to liberal-fascist political figures any longer.</p><p>Still, though, as tragic, unforgivable and vile his actions were that night in 1969 on Martha’s Vineyard, it was really his leftist politics that have damaged this nation much more than his drunken escapades and lack of morality turned deadly. So many of his stances on various issues eschewed the notions of individual freedom and responsibility, and promoted the growing <em><strong>in loco parentis </strong></em>Meta-State which threatens all logic and personal choice. He has favored creating a bloated and restrictive socialist health care system over tort reform or the minimizing of federal interstate commerce interference. He supported bitterly inane school busing programs which made political pawns of peoples' children and only furthered racial divides and ill will. His attitudes on illegal immigration were almost frightening in their irrationality and <span>unmerited </span>arrogance. He was constantly behind the state theft of personal income via taxation, and redistributing wealth to ineffective government programs and labyrinthine bureaucracy, all the while feigning altruism.</p>I cannot, in any fashion, say I'm the least bit moved by Kennedy's death. I do however, as in any instance like this, feel for the family, and wish them my condolences.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-35090539850486240402009-08-13T15:33:00.000-07:002009-08-13T16:13:40.755-07:00Obama-nazis going after Glenn BeckGlenn Beck calls dickhead Obama a "racist," which is exactly what he is, and Obama's leftist media cronies go after him with a <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/08/13/obama-brownshirts-try-to-silence-glenn-beck/">threat of a boycott</a>.<br /><br />Let's ignore the fact that anyone disagreeing with the left on anything has been labeled a <span style="font-style: italic;">racist </span>for decades... everyday... it's perfectly fine when they race-bait. Bush was constantly called a nazi and a racist. Same with Palin. Heck, anyone even remotely criticizing Obama on anything has been called that at least once or twice.<br /><br />Heck, here's a perfect example of leftist "<a href="http://www.ruthgroup.org/2009/08/10/dont-support-those-who-support-hate/">I don't get the irony</a>." "<span style="font-style: italic;">Don't support those who hate</span>." Man, I wish I could make this stuff up. Beck accusing someone else, Obama, of hate is hate. But the reverse? Naaaaaaaah.<br /><br />While I'm fairly certain Fox News will stand up for Glenn Beck to some degree, more so than the shits at CNN would have, and find new advertisers, it's time to stand up against companies who support the left in their witch-hunts.<br /><br />Sure, they're free to advertise where they want, and should be, but you're free to boycott them, just like the left would.<br /><br />So far make sure to boycott: Travelocity, ConAgra, Roche, Radio Shack, Sanofi-Aventis, <span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content">SC Johnson, Progressive Insurance & Geico.<br /><br />Hey, Geico, fuck you and your little lizard. And Radio Shack, you only sell crap anyway.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Update:</span><br /><br />The race-baiting entitlement-whores at the NAACP got in on the <a href="http://www.naacp.org/news/press/2009-07-30/index.htm?gclid=CJb_y-DdoZwCFRkpawodem44jA">Beck-bashing</a>.<br /></span></span><blockquote>Mr. Beck’s statement was irresponsible and inflammatory at a time when as a nation we are attempting to engage in a constructive dialogue on race. </blockquote>Really? Here's an idea, fuckwits - if this is in anyway true, how about getting folks on the left to apologize for calling anyone that doesn't agree with their policies and positions on race "racist" like every second of every day, and ending the practice in the future?<br /><blockquote>Beck’s statements are an attempt to divide when we need to be united, an attempt to inflame with rhetoric when we need to discuss with thoughtfulness the serious question of race. </blockquote>Is that what calling someone a "racist" does? Gee, geese, look at them ganders.<br /><blockquote><br />It is a futile effort to distract from the serious issues of health care, the economy and the environment – issues that President Obama is tackling with foresight and fortitude. </blockquote>Riiiiiiight. Because bringing up some minor comment made by a talk-show host in one little segment, calling people to arms to boycott his show, is really, really, really focusing on the above-mentioned "serious issues." I mean, that wouldn't be distracting at all, to make a big deal over a word tossed about by the left on a daily basis, would it?<br /><blockquote>How could the President be a racist? </blockquote>By behaving in a <a href="http://www2.morganton.com/content/2009/aug/12/nieters-police-deserve-more-respect-president/">racist fashion</a>, dipshits.<br /><span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content"><br /><br /></span></span>JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-5138298998973952372009-08-07T10:05:00.000-07:002009-08-07T10:30:27.105-07:00Only a matter of time until protesters get called "terrorist"Yesterday, when I mentioned how dipshit <a href="http://jsingood.blogspot.com/2009/08/speaking-of-health-care.html">Harry Reid had accused American citizens exercising their right to free speech and assembly of sabotaging the democratic process</a>, I <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">almost </span>said "it'll only be a matter of time before some dickwad calls us 'terrorists'." And the only reason I didn't was because I actually decided it was TOO obvious to mention.<br /><br />But who is the massive asswipe, whose mother must have been a syphilis ridden whore to have produced an offspring with such a warped mind (ha ha, I'm better at name-calling than you are!), who actually did call those criticizing the Democratic attempt to socialize health care "political terrorists"?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/06/AR2009080603854.html">Steven Pearlstein at the Washington Post</a>.<br /><br />I'm not even going to bother to counter his inane editorial. At least not until he and his paper apologizes to me and everyone else who does not support this proposed continued rape of taxpayer income and personal freedom masquerading as "reform." Even if he were absolutely correct in his reasoning for supporting the current plan, which he is not, it is beyond offensive to be labeling anyone exercising their right to free speech as "terrorists," whatever their motives. Unless they're blowing up buildings, or shooting up daycare centers, or whatever, they're not terrorists, they're just folks actively engaged at speaking out against and stopping legislation - even if we assume their motives are selfish or corrupt - which you are free to do. But selfishness or protesting or preventing legislation from passing within legal means wouldn't be terrorism. It's called liberty.<br /><br />Steven, your mother is a fucking assmuncher. How's that feel? How's it feel to see someone you probably love and respect insulted? My grandparents are completely against this plan too. And they're like 80. They're not terrorists. Fuck you.<br /><br />Of course, these are just words. He'll defend his while decrying mine, I'm sure. He can obviously dish it out, so he'd better get used to taking it. Well, I'm guessing from his stupidity, he probably takes donkey cocks up the ass on weekends, but I have no real way of verifying that.<br /><br />In any case, it's great these idiots keep mentioning how we'll get to keep private insurance. Wow. We'll get to pay our own insurance costs, AND pay extra taxes to cover fuckers who refuse to insure themselves. Wheeee.<br /><br />Get it yet?JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-62354606054098540592009-08-06T15:24:00.000-07:002009-08-06T16:24:29.568-07:00Speaking of Health Care...Jumping on the Democratic Party's new "<a href="http://jsingood.blogspot.com/2009/08/chilling-all-of-sudden-democratic-party.html">Protesters are the New Child Molester</a>" strategic talking point bandwagon, Senate Majority Leader & world-class champion ass-clown Harry Reid declares dissent to health care "reform" as a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090806/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_overhaul">threat to the nebulous "democratic process," </a>by which of course he means, to the Federal government stealing your income by way of taxes, taking control of your personal lives, and shoving another bloated government program down your throats despite the fact that a major chunk of the population is completely uninterested in giving up their individual liberty and personal freedom - or in giving up on the free market and replacing it with a tyrannical socialist system.<br /><blockquote>WASHINGTON – <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249597540_0">The Senate</span>'s most powerful Democrat on Thursday scolded health care protesters dogging his party's lawmakers at local meetings, arguing that some critics on the political right have run out of ideas — and ditched their civic manners. <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249597540_1">Majority Leader Harry Reid</span> of <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249597540_2">Nevada</span> accused the protesters of trying to "sabotage" the democratic process.</blockquote>In case you're wondering, yes, Harry Reid really is that much of a dick. Amazed yet by the arrogance and short-term memory loss displayed by these idiotic douchebags? I've <a href="http://jsingood.blogspot.com/2009/08/chilling-all-of-sudden-democratic-party.html">already addressed</a> the irrationality of this line of argument, but still, "sabotage"? How on Earth does expressing opinions or protesting "sabotage" democracy?<br /><br />Make sure flag@whitehouse.gov hears about this fishy post!!!JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-23881481496422719362009-08-06T10:10:00.000-07:002009-08-06T14:53:51.106-07:00Chilling: All of a Sudden, the Democratic Party thinks Protests are BAD<h1 id="yn-story-title"><span style="font-size:100%;"></span></h1><h1 id="yn-story-title"><span style="font-size:100%;"></span></h1><h1 id="yn-story-title"><span style="font-size:100%;"></span></h1><blockquote><h1 id="yn-story-title"><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/cq/politics3187760"><span style="font-size:100%;">Health Debate Produces Angry Protests, Angry Retorts</span></a></h1>The Earth-scorching August firefight over health care has given rise to questions about the point at which stifling civil discussion damages the democratic process.</blockquote><blockquote></blockquote><blockquote></blockquote><span style="font-style: italic;">The Democratic Party supports free speech and free assembly, but only when such activities are in support of the Party. Dissenters of course should not be allowed to speak freely or rally against opinions and policies which have been approved by our glorious leaders. Freedom only works when it is completely controlled by a One Party State.</span><br /><blockquote>"Organized mobs across the country are intimidating lawmakers, disrupting events, and silencing discussions about the change our country needs," one Obama campaign aide wrote in an e-mail to supporters in Michigan.</blockquote>Be careful to note the inclusion of phraseology regarding content of the message of the protesters, "change our country needs." The sin, it is implied, is not in organizing mobs, intimidating tyrants, disrupting bullshit staged propaganda clambakes, or silencing one-sided speeches masquerading as "discussions," the sin is that these activities are aimed at the not-to-be-questioned "change our country needs."<br /><br />But really? "Disrupting events" is now a major crime to these people?<br /><br />Because, gee whiz, Democrat supporters have never, ever, ever, ever protested, or rallied, or shouted down lawmakers, or disrupted an assemblage supporting some agenda with which they disagreed, or attempted to silence discussion in any forum (well, except right here, right now on that last one). Right? I mean, I couldn't perform an internet search right now and find a single example of that ever happening, correct?<br /><br />I'm not even going to get into the irony embedded in the phrase "organized mob." Hint, though, remember that mobs are by definition "disorderly." But it's the sort of colorful, somewhat sarcastic turn of phrase I might use at my most smart-assed, so I'll give them a pass.<br /><br />In typical leftist fashion, though, the Democratic Party plays the victimization card for the umpteenth time here, whining about "intimidation," while at the very same time, calling their supporters to arms to <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/05/cult-leader-to-followers-get-out-there-and-get-in-peoples-faces-on-health-care/">show up at meetings</a>, and to <a href="http://jsingood.blogspot.com/2009/08/health-care-insurance-reform.html">turn in information about dissenters to the White House thought-police</a>. It's altogether amusing that the Democratic Party has attempted to portray these "mobs" as puppets of special interests and corporations, ignoring their grassroots formation, thus the in this context insulting "organized" modifier, while at the same attempting to organize their own mobs to counter these allegedly (although unproven to be) "organized" mobs.<br /><br />The hypocrisy astounds.<br /><br />If the Democratic Party was at all interested in legitimate discussion and brainstorming about reforming health care, why don't they invite people who oppose the plan onto the podium as well, and make it an honest debate? Hmmmmm? Why are they in such a hurry to push through the plan as currently composed while decrying any analysis of any of the specifics or details (such as the "diversity" clauses, the funding for illegal immigrant health care, etc.)?<br /><br />Now, let it be known, I really have no problem with politicians of any ilk calling supporters together to promote agendas. I mean, great, involve the voters actively in the political process. Bring it to the people, and let the people respond. Get those who care strongly about an issue out of their chairs and onto the floor. But why whine about some other guy's body order when you yourself forgot to shower?<br /><br />It just kind of sort of makes you look incredibly fucking stupid.<br /><blockquote>"What's legitimate dissent is something that provides for constructive dialogue in advancing the discussion on <span class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249577202_3">health insurance reform</span>," [Hari Sevugan, a spokesman for the <span style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249585045_2">Democratic National Committee] </span>said.</blockquote>Hey, motherfucker, who the motherfuck are you to tell the public what is and is not legitimate dissent? Who the motherfuck are you, you arrogant shitbrained ass, to define "legitimate" as only that which advances your agenda? FUCK YOU. Guess what? Maybe some people are not at all interested in advancing the discussion on your view of change. Guess what? Maybe some people don't trust you enough to believe you would even remotely take "constructive dialogue" into consideration. I don't think you will, honestly.<br /><br />Has the Democratic Party offered anything remotely resembling "constructive dialogue" on health care?<br /><br />And in case you're wondering, yes, non-constructive dialogue is as protected a liberty as constructive dialogue. And The Man don't get to pick which is which.<br /><br />It's like all of a sudden, Democrats grew a flippin' conscience about how to respectfully treat lawmakers. You mean, in the new Obama-led nationalist socialist world order, I'm not allowed to draw little Hilter mustaches on Obama, or burn him in effigy, or portray his sasquatch of a wife as a demented vampiric whore, they way say liberals have done to Bush and Palin?<br /><br />Maybe a quote from some ivory tower elitist bullshitter professor will help me put it all in perspective:<br /><blockquote><p>But the nature of the protests suggest the <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249577202_6">GOP</span> has run out of options for fighting on substance, said David S. Meyer, a sociology professor at the University of California-Irvine who wrote The Politics of Protest: <span style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249577202_7">Social Movements</span> in America.</p> <p> "In historical context, it's a tool of the weak," Meyer said. He said it is noteworthy "that conservatives have to throw this kind of Hail Mary pass to stop <span style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(0, 102, 204); cursor: pointer;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249577202_8">health care reform</span>" in a political system that favors that status quo.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>Oh, thank the mystic beaver spirits of the River Hoobastank for the infallible unbiased enlightenment of higher educators. Weakness, in this context, Mr. PhD in dumbfuckery, is measured by who is in power, not by "substance." Does this mean that during the civil rights era, blacks were not "fighting on substance" when their only option was non-violent protest?<br /></p><p>C'mon!</p><p>And let's just ignore the fact that rather than addressing the criticisms of the Democratic health care "reform" plans, all the attacks dogs are going after the dissenters with insults. Get it? They're going after the DISSENTERS, not the DISSENT - not the content.</p><p>I mean, I'm fine with that. I'll insult the FUCK out of you if you disagree with me. But when I do, I don't run around with a diploma in no-one-gives-a-fuck pretending I'm not doing anything other than insulting. In fact, that's why I make my insults so heavy-handed and outright mean-spirited - dipshits - so that there is absolutely no illusion when I do insult; it's instantly recognized as the low-side - the humorous, emotional, more entertaining aspect of my discussion. I don't dress it up in pseudo-intellectual, University of California leftist window-dressing. I make it fun and colorful. I mean, calling someone "weak" is pretty fucking "weak." Grow a fucking state-funded pair and come up with some real manly jabs. And get a real football team at your university before using a lame, cliche football metaphor.<br /></p><p>People are angry and are expressing their dissatisfaction with the Democrat plan for "change." They are protesting what they see as tyranny, just like millions of liberals have done for decades.<br /></p><p></p><blockquote><p>..."irony is abundant" in the role-reversal for the community-organizer in chief. "It's going to be interesting to see how the <span style="background: transparent none repeat scroll 0% 0%; cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" class="yshortcuts" id="lw_1249577202_16">community organizer</span> president is going to respond to communities organized by his political opponents."</p></blockquote><p></p>That's right, motherfucker. Ha!<br /><br />And like before:<br /><br />If possible, please forward the URL for this blog entry to the totalitarian <span style="font-style: italic;">thought police</span> at <a href="mailto:flag@whitehouse.gov">flag@whitehouse.gov</a>, who want to know "[i]f you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy." I want to make sure I'm on all the right dissenter lists.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-11821655668333090772009-08-06T08:06:00.000-07:002009-08-06T12:34:01.908-07:00Bad Idea: Financial Times editor says most news websites will charge within a yearHere's a stupid idea:<br /><blockquote>In a speech in London, <a class="snap_shots" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/16/financial-times-lionel-barber">Financial Times Editor Lionel Barber </a>said that within the next 12 months, news agencies will be charging access to their websites. The only matter that will be discussed, according to the editor, is whether they should charge per month or per article or possibly even both. "I confidently predict that within the next 12 months, almost all news organisations will be charging for content." </blockquote><br /><br />I already ignore news sites that currently charge. Heck, I often ignore sites that force you to register and log-in to read, even if it's free. Big media is trying to control information - but it's only going to drive people to more blogs (which are by nature, more one-sided and editorial in nature - regardless of the political slant). The model news agencies employ for television should work on the internet. Allow free access and sell advertising space. And you know what, any major news agency that doesn't charge when others start to will see a huge increase in traffic, and thus a huge increase in revenues.<br /><br />This is what the political machines want. They want information limited, so that they can control public knowledge and dissent. Television and newspaper hope that by reigning in the internet, they'll drive people back to their dying media (paper, broadcast, cable...).<br /><br />Less scrupulous interneters are just going to cut-and-paste relevant sections of stories into blogs and forums anyway.<br /><br />"News" as a commodity is increasingly becoming a thing of the past - especially unbiased even-handed, straight-facts reporting. The supply online is limitless. But the demand for perspective and consolidated forums will be there, and that's what they need to focus on - getting hits so that people see those little money producing ads.<br /><br />All this will do is put the final nail in the coffin of big news media.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-47545137433342352202009-08-04T13:47:00.000-07:002009-08-06T12:34:51.888-07:00Health Care "Insurance Reform"<span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content">Good news on the Big Brother front, Chairman MAObama wants you to turn in your neighbor if he doesn't agree with the socialization of health care: <a href="http://bit.ly/3exiaD" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/3exiaD</a><br /><br />According to the White House "blog":<br /></span></span><blockquote><span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content"><br /></span></span>For the record, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">the President has consistently said that if you like your insurance plan, your doctor, </span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">or both, you will be able to keep them</span>.</blockquote><br />Keeping our current plans, for the record, morons, is hardly the only complaint about this massive turd of a plan. Nor is the president "consistently" saying something to counter complaints about what the bill itself actually says.<br /><br />This bill will burden the tax-payer with massively inefficient governmental bureaucracy and costs. Change is not necessarily "reform." We need to move in the right direction to reduce the costs of medical care - reducing federal regulations which drive up health care and insurance costs, and tort reform to reduce frivolous lawsuits, which run in the billions. Reduce taxes, so that individuals and families can afford to make their own health care choices, rather than have their wallets raided to pay for unnecessary programs, bureaucratic middle-men and government waste.<br /><br />Sure, perhaps you will be able to keep your current insurance/provider for awhile, but in the long run, this government program will bankrupt them and all private health providers, and eventually over time there will be nothing left but government-run health care.<br /><br />Don't be fooled. This is a blatant seizing of power by the Feds, an attempt to further control every aspect of your private lives and your pocketbooks. And this from the supposedly "pro-choice" side of the aisle. Ha!<br /><br />If possible, please forward the URL for this blog entry to the totalitarian <span style="font-style: italic;">thought police</span> at <a href="mailto:flag@whitehouse.gov">flag@whitehouse.gov</a>, who want to know "[i]f you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy." I want to make sure I'm on all the right dissenter lists.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-91026841156494128722009-03-24T15:45:00.000-07:002009-03-24T15:46:47.205-07:00The Beginning of the EndYou have been <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510364,00.html">warned</a>.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-49993433075541146592009-02-19T15:42:00.000-08:002009-02-19T15:45:17.718-08:00An Open Letter to California State Senator Christine KehoeDishonorable Christine Kehoe,<br /><br />I see that you've <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090219/ap_on_re_us/california_budget">raised my taxes</a> rather than eliminating government waste - despite the fact that you morons have increased this waste by 40% in the past five years. Go fuck yourself, you evil cunt. You're a vile thief, stealing money from hard-working Californians, and pissing it away on moronic programs, the lazy, illegals who don't pay taxes, and bloated bureaucracy. And, most stupidly, all you're doing is stifling the already poor economy even more, sending more business out of state. Great job, dipshit!JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-2482688879880297882009-01-28T15:45:00.001-08:002009-01-28T15:47:30.520-08:00A Go-Green Guide for the Hollywood Community<a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dburge/2009/01/26/ten-things-you-can-do-to-save-the-planet/">Hilarious</a>.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-33413330591583648682009-01-28T09:25:00.000-08:002009-08-06T12:37:16.528-07:00Benicio del Toro = another Hollywood douchebagWhile it is hardly surprising to find another leftist Hollywood actor elitist hypocrite moron spouting off sanctimonious liberal idiocy, it is amusing to see one storm off in a <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/27/del-toro-walks-away-from-questions-on-che/">bitchy hissy fit</a> when called out on his or her disassociation with reality and distorted historical revisionism.<br /><br />Yeah, Benicio. Somehow in a four and a half hour film, you couldn't find time to point out that the guy you're portraying was a homicidal maniac? That's kind of like doing a five-hour miniseries about Jeffrey Dahmer, never mentioning murder and only saying that he liked to have friends over for snacks.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-33161466460605857292009-01-28T09:19:00.000-08:002009-01-28T09:22:35.561-08:00More Reasons to Oppose Obama and the Democrat's "Stimulus" PlanBecause, deep down, did anyone really expect anything except <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123310466514522309.html">waste, liberal fascist regulation, unfair handouts and more bloated bureaucracy</a> from these wastes of sperm and egg?JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-36398752128411703712009-01-27T15:46:00.001-08:002009-01-27T15:49:49.075-08:0010 Reasons to Oppose the So-Called "Stimulus" Plan<a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2009/1/27/10-reasons-to-nix-the-stimulus-plan.html">The 10 Reasons</a>JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-21943851706108529102008-12-03T13:35:00.000-08:002008-12-03T14:45:22.606-08:00Prop 8 in a nutshellSomehow the <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/12/03/who-will-make-the-other-prop-8-musical/">constant bigotry against Christians by the left</a> shows that liberals are more tolerant than those prejudiced against homosexuals?<br /><br />As an agnostic and a libertarian, I've come to realize that the simple fact is that very few Californians of any political persuasion operate with even the slightest degree of rationality, compassion, tolerance or respect for liberty. There should be equal outrage over the passage of Prop 2 and the failure of Prop 4 to pass. But the fundamental rights of farmers and parents are deemed unimportant and open to fascist oppression by the left. But look at how they sing and whine when the rights of their special interest groups are curtailed by the same democratic election process.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-35479058825143331612008-09-24T11:31:00.000-07:002008-09-24T11:55:28.078-07:00A Must Read<a href="http://www.takimag.com/site/article/the_diversity_recession_or_how_affirmative_action_helped_cause_the_housing/">The Diversity Recession, or How Affirmative Action Helped Cause the Housing Crisis</a><br /><blockquote><br />Rather than make the fundamental reforms needed to help the bottom half actually become economically productive and domestically stable enough to afford to buy a home, the government tried to juice the home-ownership rate directly.</blockquote>In a nutshell, rather than making any attempt to address the problem of poverty itself (and what the government should be responsible in that regard, of course, is up to much debate), any system of "objective measurements" was considered racist and discriminatory, and the Feds encouraged riskier business practices to make the system more <span style="font-style: italic;">inclusive</span>. In other words, common sense and thoughtful, objective business practices were to blame, not actual individuals personal responsibility and incomes.<br /><br />This is completely analogous to how affirmative action thinking has warped the education system. Objective measures like GPA and test scores are increasingly considered racist, and the responsibility for achievement has shifted from individual students to the institutions themselves. Rather than address any problems with academic preparation prior to college, whether with the students or the K-12 schools, universities are expected to create a<span style="font-style: italic;"> level playing field</span>, shifting the blame to an objective system, vilifying real success, diluting the quality of education for all, and creating unfairness all around.<br /><br />Something to keep in mind as the Federal government, both Democrats and Republicans alike, contemplate a <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YWUyODc0NjMzZjVlOTFlYmQ2ODFjMDU0ZTllMDQ1ODI=">$700 Billion dollar bailout</a>, at least.<br /><br />Also, Michelle Malkin <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/23/kill-the-bailout-phones-ringing-off-the-hook/">notes</a> that:<br /><br />"Student loans, car loans, and credit card debt have been snuck into the bailout proposal."JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-70806904735298598622008-09-19T09:49:00.000-07:002008-09-19T09:50:21.801-07:00Obama's email hacked!!!Anonymous moves on....<br /><br /><a href="http://americandigest.org/Obama-Deletes-Inbox_redo.jpg">Here</a>JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-69525025065357296982008-09-18T16:09:00.000-07:002008-09-18T16:21:14.374-07:00Biden confuses raping the taxpayer with patriotismJoe Biden, VP candidate, suggests that <a href="http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2008/09/18/biden_says_mccains_economic_answers_go_nowhere">paying higher taxes would be patriotic for wealthier Americans</a>. According to the braindead Senator:<br /><blockquote>It's time to be patriotic ... time to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut.</blockquote>Right, because all that money they've been paying all along doesn't count as being "part of the deal." Only by paying even freaking MORE can they then be considered "patriotic." Sorry, rich folk, your previous outrageously high tax payments didn't reach the threshold of patriotism. Not even a thank you do you deserve.<br /><br />How much does Biden, or Obama, make? And with this statement, is he not suggesting that neither he nor Obama have been patriotic yet?<br /><br />Biden also noted:<br /><blockquote>We want to take money...</blockquote>Yeah, that just about sums it the fuck up.<br /><blockquote>...and put it back in the pocket of middle-class people.</blockquote>Back? Playing Robin Hood is hardly "back."<br /><br />I'm all for lowering taxes on the middle class - and in general - though. But if you want to use the word "back," you should say something more like "we Senators are sorry for taxing the crap out of you America, and squandering it on worthlessness. Instead, we're going to lower your taxes, reduce government waste, and give you some of your money <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">back </span>in the form of rebates."<br /><br />Biden acts like rich people somehow stole from the middle-class, when it's really the government that's been stealing from everybody.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-7249173864733695132008-09-18T11:34:00.000-07:002008-09-18T11:55:14.460-07:00Another good argument against the public funding of educationSomehow, higher education has distorted the term "academic freedom" to mean "should have taxes and student fees fund professors with absolutely no expectation that they educate or have any job performance requirements what-so-ever" as well as "they can attempt to politically indoctrinate and belittle your children all they want, with extreme bias and a complete lack of ethical behavior - GIVE ME MONEY." Taxed citizens and tuition payers of Colorado, meet the <a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75426">shitheadfuck</a> you bought and paid for.<br /><br /><p></p><blockquote><p>Students in an English class at <a style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" href="http://www.mscd.edu/%7Eenglish/">Metropolitan State College</a> in Denver have been told to assemble criticisms of <a id="KonaLink0" target="_top" class="kLink" style="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75426#"><span style="color: blue ! important; font-family: "Times New Roman",Georgia,Serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; position: static;color:blue;" ><span class="kLink" style="color: blue ! important; font-family: "Times New Roman",Georgia,Serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; position: static;">GOP</span></span></a> vice presidential candidate Gov. Sarah Palin that "undermine" her, and students say they are concerned about the apparent bias.</p> <p>"This so-called 'assignment' represents indoctrination in its purist form," said Matt Barber, director of Cultural Affairs with Liberty Counsel, whose sister, Janna, is taking the class from Andrew Hallam, a new instructor at the school.</p> <p>The instructor also, according to students, is harshly critical of <a id="KonaLink1" target="_top" class="kLink" style="text-decoration: underline ! important; position: static;" href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75426#"><span style="color: blue ! important; font-family: "Times New Roman",Georgia,Serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; position: static;color:blue;" ><span class="kLink" style="color: blue ! important; font-family: "Times New Roman",Georgia,Serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; position: static;">President </span><span class="kLink" style="color: blue ! important; font-family: "Times New Roman",Georgia,Serif; font-weight: 400; font-size: 17px; position: static;">Bush</span></span></a> during his classroom English presentations. He reportedly has allowed students who identify themselves as "liberal" to deride and ridicule those who identify themselves as "conservative" or Republican.</p></blockquote><p></p>If you were a high school teacher in San Francisco, and told students to write a paper undermining <a href="http://www.obamasoundoff.com/">Barack</a> <a href="http://www.obamasoundoff.com/page2.html">Obama</a>, (or say a radio host on a PRIVATELY owned radio station) you'd be labeled a fascist who abuses his position for the unethical purposes of brainwashing. But, hey, if you're being paid by state funds, and your students are a year older, then, hey, there should be no accountability at all.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-37998065027452887602008-09-17T15:24:00.000-07:002008-09-17T15:56:37.818-07:00Schwarzenegger finds his testicles<blockquote>Extending the state's longest budget fight, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced Tuesday that he will veto a proposed state budget that "takes our problems and makes them even worse."</blockquote>Story <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/1242404.html">here</a>.<br /><br />While I was in no way happy with Schwarzenegger's plan to "temporarily" raise taxes, I am pleased to see him take a stand on this boondoggle of a compromise. Kudos to Republican legislatures for at least preventing any substantial tax increases. Somehow, and this is probably pure fantasy on my part, these morons, especially the Democrats, in Sacramento need to learn that taxation, especially outrageously high taxes, are an affront to personal liberty and responsibility, and that high taxes along with reckless spending and waste only further slow the economy. It is disgraceful that our elected officials have been nothing but irresponsible with their spending - throwing away money disgracefully and irresponsibly on ineffective program after ineffective program, special interest handout after special interest handout.<br /><br /><p></p><blockquote><p>At a news conference, Schwarzenegger initially said that he would kill all the bills on his desk if legislators override his budget veto.</p><p>Pressed on the issue, Schwarzenegger seemed to soften his stance. More than 800 bills await his approval or veto this month.</p></blockquote><p></p><p>Initially, Arnie found both his balls, then lost one as it rolled back under his dress. Girly man.</p><p>Probably the scariest reminder in this article is that while these dipshits in Sacramento cannot balance the budget (hint, dumbfucks: CUT, CUT, CUT - SPEND ONLY WHAT YOU HAVE - THERE'S ONLY SO MUCH BLOOD LEFT IN THE TAXPAYERS YOU FUCKING VAMPIRES), the idiots managed to pass 800 <span style="font-weight: bold;">NEW </span>bills that they'd like to see passed into law. It's like watching a retarded child continuously running into a sliding glass door, unable to learn from his own mistakes and pain. 800 fucking times. A year! For fucking decades!!!<br /></p><p style="font-style: italic;">Dear Sacramento,</p><p style="font-style: italic;">Thanks for the highest taxes in nation!!!! And thanks even more for pissing it all away. Hell, pissing away more than is even in the bladder!!!! YAY! I'm thrilled to be living under your iron fist and your vast stupidity. I mean, if you actually spent the money on something USEFUL, like roads, or law enforcement, or fire protection, I might even not complain as much. But, shit, even as you rape our increasingly starved asses, you can't even provide us with the basics. No, no, no.</p><p style="font-style: italic;">Oh yeah, quit banning everything under the sun, like foie gras, lightbulbs and trash bags, you ignorant, totalitarian nazi fucks.</p><p style="font-style: italic;">Love,</p><p><span style="font-style: italic;">Me!</span><br /></p><p>PS: As long as I'm ranting, Rage Against The Machine is totally the suckiest band in the universe.<br /></p>JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-4751163461372383842008-09-17T13:54:00.000-07:002008-09-17T14:05:58.126-07:00Janeane Garofalo = Stupid BitchYes, yes, little Ms. Funny-As-A-Car-Accident proves to be the world's <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/16/janeane-garofolo-great-jail-all-republicans">biggest fucking hypocrite</a>, and a completely deranged shithead, by suggesting that Republicans are less "decent" than Democrats and that the Republican party has become "a<span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span>party of small minded, very petty, mean... unrestrained id." Right, because mean-spirited, sweeping generalizations are just the epitome of decency, open-mindedness and logical thought.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-2776854824050094612008-09-16T15:49:00.000-07:002008-09-16T15:52:09.499-07:00David Foster Wallace commits suicideJohn Ziegler, who was the subject of a long-winded, inane hit-piece by the douchebag David Foster Wallace, has his reaction <a href="http://johnziegler.com/editorials_details.asp?editorial=165">here</a>.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-21016080767507480092008-09-10T14:21:00.000-07:002008-09-10T14:28:44.636-07:00Political Correctness in, Education outFar too few people are paying attention to the liberal fascism that is going on in higher education nowadays. Thankfully, there are a still a few out there who value personal liberty over political correctness.<br /><br />As it stands, and I've seen this in action at the state university where I work, affirmative action/social justice political litmus tests have been put in place in the hiring practices of faculty and staff. <br /><br />As <i>Daphne Patai </i>puts it:<br />"It's hard to say just when universities ceased to believe that education was a worthwhile mission. But that they have done so is beyond question. Among many signs of this reality is the anxiety to redefine the university's task. After all, educators who no longer expect or demand serious intellectual effort from their students are bound to look elsewhere for ways to justify their existence and that of their institutions. Enter the language of "community engagement," "outreach," "social justice," and "equity" (to name just a few of the terms now used as rallying cries on many campuses)."<br /><br />Read <a href="http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2008/09/by_daphne_patai_its_hard.html">this</a> now!JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-42923505080431655332008-09-04T13:58:00.000-07:002008-09-04T14:04:47.893-07:00More University of California DiversinsanityUCLA violates state law and all semblance of ethical, fair behavior in order to <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTY1NjRlZmVkOGE4MjA2ZWUzYzk1ZjU3YTg1Njg5Njk=">grant special hiring and admission privileges to African-Americans</a>. Who would have guessed such behavior from bigoted, reverse discriminating, immoral, mindless left-wing, ivory tower douchebags? Equality, ha! Special entitlements, check.<br /><br />I'll tell you what, similar bullshit is going on at the other University of California campuses as well. Especially San Diego, where you are even beginning to see political litmus tests in hiring practices.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8052117.post-18252308920443056252008-03-18T13:32:00.001-07:002008-03-18T13:51:49.755-07:00Barack Obama Tries to Save His Own ButtBubbleheaded propagandist Barack Obama did his best to distance himself from his despicable, radical, twisted pastor of 20 years, <a href="http://www.discriminations.us/2008/03/what_did_obama_know_and_when_d.html">Jeremiah Wright</a>, in a 40-minute <a href="http://www.drudgereport.com/flashos.htm">speech</a> in Philadelphia today.<br /><br />Obama proved himself again to be very good at dodging the issue, piling on the fluff and avoiding talking about specifics of his own views and plans. So much of the speech was about how other people, even his grandmother, think and have behaved, and why - but hardly really touched upon <strong><em>HOW</em> </strong> voting for him, as opposed to Clinton or McCain, would in any way bring more positive <em><strong>CHANGE</strong></em> on race relations in America. Well, he did evoke the specter of educational funding at some point. Obama is well-versed in double-speak - all the while decrying divisiveness (which I suppose to him means people not completely agreeing with him), there were plenty of implications of societal or structural blame tossed around, at conservative pundits, at “segregated schools,” etc.<br /><blockquote>Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. ..... He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.<br /><br />I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community.</blockquote>Sure you can, Obama, you liar. Despite painting Wright as some super-metaphor representing heterogeneous Black America, and all its varied views - Wright is nothing of the sort. He is NOT the entirety of the "black community," he is merely one black man with a following - a man and a congregation with ugly, vile, malicious ideas. This is all part of Obama's eloquent subterfuge - he danced around the issues without really saying anything of substance or committing to a stance.<br /><br />And, he implies that somehow disowning this psychopath is equivalent to disowning the entire black community? This is the same piss-poor logic applied so often by minority apologists who claim that holding a minority up to any standard (like, say, OJ Simpson) is somehow the same as condemning the entire race. Any criticism of one, for holding someone accountable for his views, opinions and/or actions, is to be viewed as an attack on the entire race. And, somehow, it's everyone <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">BUT </span>Obama that is racist or "divisive."<br /><br />Sadly, a lot of people with their eyes closed will be fooled by his smooth, empty rhetoric, and will believe just that.JsinGoodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11310057523024447390noreply@blogger.com0